Recent developments in the fields of physics and cosmology have led to a significant reevaluation of our understanding of the universe’s shape, size, and workings. A series of papers and theories have emerged, challenging the prevailing Standard Model of Cosmology (SMC) and raising questions about the compatibility of General Relativity (GR) and Quantum Mechanics (QM). Here, we explore these groundbreaking ideas and their potential implications.
Major cracks have appeared in the standard model of cosmology.
Challenging the Standard Model of Cosmology (SMC):
- Closed Universe Hypothesis: A recent study published in Nature Astronomy suggests with 99% confidence that our universe is closed, contradicting the prevailing notion of an open, flat, and infinite universe. Another paper even presents odds against an open universe at 2000:1. These findings seriously challenge the SMC, signaling a need for reevaluation.
- Eight Shortcomings of SMC: Eight significant shortcomings of the SMC have been identified, further eroding confidence in its validity. These issues, when considered together, indicate a crisis in the field of cosmology.
The Conflict Between General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics:
- Mutual Incompatibility: General Relativity (GR) and Quantum Mechanics (QM), the foundational pillars of modern physics, are fundamentally incompatible. This incongruity has led to an ongoing conflict between these two fundamental theories.
- Acknowledged Crisis: Physicists themselves acknowledge the crisis in physics due to the incompatibility of GR and QM. This acknowledgment highlights the urgency of finding a resolution to this long-standing issue.
A New Perspective: The Expanding Balloon Model of the Universe:
- Proposal by Subhajit Waugh: Scientist Subhajit Waugh proposes that the incompatibility between GR and QM may arise from our incorrect model of the universe. He presents an alternative model known as the “expanding (hyper) balloon” model, which he claims can unify physics and cosmology, approaching the concept of a “theory of everything.”
- Foundation of the Model: In this model, the universe resembles an expanding balloon, where the 3D hypersurface of fields represents the universe’s structure. Particles are considered excitations in these fields. The temporal part of this model correlates with the passage of time for observers within the universe, while the expansion of the balloon’s wall accounts for Hubble’s law.
- Reevaluating Einstein’s SpaceTime Continuum: Waugh challenges Einstein’s concept of the four-dimensional ‘SpaceTime continuum,’ arguing that it is a mistake that has led to a flawed understanding of time. He asserts that time is not an illusion and offers insights into the mathematical foundations of this discrepancy.
A Paradigm Shift in Science:
- Shaky Mathematical Pillars: Waugh suggests that science is built on shaky mathematical assumptions, and correcting these assumptions could trigger a paradigm shift in science.
- Testable Predictions: Waugh makes testable and falsifiable predictions that could potentially revolutionise science, offering an alternative framework for understanding the universe.
- Anticipating a Scientific Revolution: With upcoming data from the Euclid telescope that may support the closed universe hypothesis, it is possible that a major scientific revolution is on the horizon, challenging and reshaping our current understanding of physics and cosmology.
In summary, recent developments in cosmology and physics suggest that our current models and theories may be in need of a fundamental reevaluation. The “expanding
(hyper) balloon” model of the universe and the acknowledgment of the incompatibility between GR and QM present exciting avenues for future research and exploration in these fields. The possibility of a paradigm shift in science underscores the dynamic and evolving nature of our understanding of the universe.
References
1) Planck evidence for a closed Universe and a possible crisis for cosmology
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-019-0906-9
2) Curvature tension: Evidence for a closed universe
https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.L041301
3A) A candid assessment of standard cosmology
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1538-3873/aca51f/meta
3B) Relativity versus quantum mechanics: the battle for the universe
https://www.theguardian.com/news/2015/nov/04/relativity-quantum-mechanics-universe-physicists
3C) World’s largest physics conference in Las Vegas will be grand; but will it be worthwhile?
https://www.einnews.com/pr_news/619040511/world-s-largest-physics-conference-in-las-vegas-will-be-grand-but-will-it-be-worthwhile
4A) RRCAT Physicist Proposes New Theory Unifying General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/rrcat-physicist-proposes-new-theory-unifying-general-relativity-and-quantum-mechanics-301698390.html
4B) We are wrong about the shape and size of our universe: RRCAT Physicist provides a new model of universe.
https://www.einnews.com/pr_news/645279059/we-are-wrong-about-the-shape-and-size-of-our-universe-rrcat-physicist-provides-a-new-model-of-universe
5) Shape and size of our universe: challenging the Standard Model of Cosmology
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371487379_Shape_and_size_of_our_universe_challenging_the_Standard_Model_of_Cosmology
6) Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity are compatible, and have a common origin: the expanding (hyper) balloon universe
https://www.authorea.com/users/497173/articles/578321-quantum-mechanics-and-general-relativity-are-compatible-and-have-a-common-origin-the-expanding-hyper-balloon-universe
7) Is everything we know about the shape and size of our universe, and how it works, wrong?
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7343171
8) The biggest mistake in Science: Space and Time do not fuse into SpaceTime continuum.
https://www.einnews.com/pr_news/645681233/the-biggest-mistake-in-science-space-and-time-do-not-fuse-into-spacetime-continuum
9) RRCAT Physicist Claims Correct Representation of Imaginary Numbers May Unify General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/rrcat-physicist-claims-correct-representation-202518538.html
10) Science is standing on shaky mathematical pillars, which guarantees a scientific revolution
https://www.einpresswire.com/article/617977207/science-is-standing-on-shaky-mathematical-pillars-which-guarantees-a-scientific-revolution
11) Scientist Mr. Subhajit Waugh Makes Testable and Falsifiable Predictions that Could Shake up Science to the Core
https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/scientist-mr-subhajit-waugh-makes-testable-and-falsifiable-predictions-that-could-shake-up-science-to-the-core-1032579092
12) Euclid telescope will revolutionize science, overthrow ruling scientific theories, and usher paradigm shift in science.
https://www.einnews.com/pr_news/648067906/euclid-telescope-will-revolutionize-science-overthrow-ruling-scientific-theories-and-usher-paradigm-shift-in-science
